Close Bahama Breeze locations
Delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 19 Mar 2026
- Due
- 31 May 2026
- Delivered
- by 31 May 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“closures of Bahama Breeze locations expected to occur in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company confirmed that impairment costs related to the closures of Bahama Breeze locations occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, consistent with the announced timeline.
-
A Darden Restaurants 8-K filed 2026-06-25
“Fiscal 2026 impairment costs due to non-cash asset impairment charges primarily related to the closures of Bahama Breeze locations and another underperforming location in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026.” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -4.7% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (24 Jun 2026 to 29 Jun 2026). What this measures
Checked 17 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- Deadline drift +365 days
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 19 Mar 2026
Deadline 31 May 2026 (“fourth quarter of fiscal 2026”) · wording expected
-
Version 2 · stated 24 Sep 2026
Deadline 31 May 2027 (“by Q4 fiscal 2027”) · wording expected
“excludes the impact of Bahama Breeze as all locations are expected to be closed or converted to other brands by Q4 fiscal 2027.”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Facility other
- Indicative materiality
- Medium rules
- Action
- Close
- Deliverable
- Bahama Breeze locations
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- Medium
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “Not met”.
- Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the recorded outcome.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Darden Restaurants? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2026-DRI-012639 · Corrections policy