Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

Mercury Systems Inc.

Achieve full capacity availability in common processing architecture product area

Not delivered by the deadline

AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.

Announced
4 Feb 2025
Due
28 Jun 2025
Checked
25 Sep 2026
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“Expect to have full capacity available as we progress through the second half of the year.”

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

The company's filings consistently state they are continuing toward full rate production of their common processing architecture programs, rather than confirming that full capacity availability has been achieved.

  • A
    Mercury Systems Inc. 10-Q filed 2025-11-04 Regulatory filing · published 4 Nov 2025 · retrieved 25 Sep 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint 343335cb8f3b
    “continued toward full rate production of our common processing architecture programs.” ✓ confirmed on the page
  • A
    Mercury Systems Inc. 10-Q filed 2026-02-03 Regulatory filing · published 3 Feb 2026 · retrieved 25 Sep 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint 97b9878caa37
    “continued toward full rate production of our common processing architecture programs.” ✓ confirmed on the page

Market reaction: the shares moved -1.2% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (3 Nov 2025 to 6 Nov 2025). What this measures

Checked 25 Sep 2026.

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Capacity change
Indicative materiality
Medium rules
Action
Achieve
Language
Expected (“expects”, “plans”)

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedRecorded from the company's filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “no_evidence”.
  4. Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the second check.

Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works

Are you Mercury Systems Inc.? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2025-MRCY-000166 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.