Close the divestiture of non-operated properties in the Delaware Basin
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.
- Announced
- 4 Aug 2025
- Due
- 30 Sep 2025
- Checked
- 17 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“This deal is expected to close in the third quarter, subject to customary closing conditions.”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company did not close the divestiture in the third quarter of 2025 as expected; the transaction was ultimately completed on February 9, 2026.
-
A Diamondback Energy 10-Q filed 2025-11-05
“The Pending Viper Non-Permian Divestiture is subject to customary closing conditions and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2026.” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A Diamondback Energy 10-K filed 2026-02-25
“On February 9, 2026, Viper divested all of its non-Permian assets” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved +3.7% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (4 Nov 2025 to 7 Nov 2025). What this measures
Checked 17 Oct 2026.
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Acquisition close
- Indicative materiality
- High rules
- Action
- Close
- Deliverable
- divestiture of non-operated properties
- Where
- Delaware Basin
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- Medium
- Specificity
- High
- Conditional
- Yes: subject to customary closing conditions
- Depends on
- Counterparty
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
- Third check on a negative finding: disagreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and read it as “no_evidence”, so a person decides.
Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works
Are you Diamondback Energy? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2025-FANG-009363 · Corrections policy