Exit private label pet nutrition business
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.
- Announced
- 31 Jan 2025
- Due
- 31 Dec 2025
- Checked
- 18 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“including the impact of the planned exit from private label pet nutrition over the course of 2025.”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
Colgate-Palmolive continued to report negative impacts from private label pet food sales in 2026, indicating the business was not fully exited by the end of 2025 as planned.
-
A Colgate-Palmolive 8-K filed 2026-05-01
“The Company still expects organic sales growth to be 1% to 4%. This includes the impact from our exit from the private label pet food business.” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A Colgate-Palmolive 10-Q filed 2026-05-01
“Organic sales in the Hill’s Pet Nutrition segment increased 2.1% in the first quarter of 2026, despite a negative impact from lower private label pet food sales (260 bps).” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A Colgate-Palmolive 10-Q filed 2026-07-31
“Organic sales in the Hill’s Pet Nutrition segment increased 2.1% in the second quarter of 2026, including a negative impact from lower private label pet food sales (200 bps).” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved +0.4% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (30 Apr 2026 to 5 May 2026). What this measures
Checked 18 Oct 2026.
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Project other
- Indicative materiality
- Low rules
- Action
- Exit
- Deliverable
- private label pet nutrition business
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “no_evidence”.
- Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the second check.
Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works
Are you Colgate-Palmolive? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2025-CL-013857 · Corrections policy