Complete the East Pembrook plant
Delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 5 Nov 2024
- Due
- 30 Jun 2026
- Delivered
- Q1 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“Targa now expects to complete its East Pembrook plant ahead of schedule in the second quarter of 2026”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company completed the East Pembrook plant in the first quarter of 2026, which is ahead of the second quarter 2026 deadline.
-
A Targa Resources 10-Q filed 2026-08-06
“East Pembrook plant, a 275 MMcf/d plant in Permian Midland (the “East Pembrook plant”), commenced operations late in the first quarter of 2026.” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved +1.9% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (5 Aug 2026 to 10 Aug 2026). What this measures
Checked 17 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- Deadline drift -303 days
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 5 Nov 2024
Deadline 30 Jun 2026 (“in the second quarter of 2026”) · wording expected
-
Version 2 · stated 7 Aug 2025
Deadline 31 Aug 2025 (“in August 2025”) · target 275 MMcf/d · wording expected
“expects early completion of its new 275 million cubic feet per day (“MMcf/d”) Pembrook II plant in Permian Midland in August 2025”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Facility other
- Indicative materiality
- Medium rules
- Action
- Complete
- Deliverable
- East Pembrook plant
- Where
- Permian Midland
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Targa Resources? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2024-TRGP-010330 · Corrections policy