Submit BLA for RP1 in anti-PD1 failed melanoma
Delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 8 Jan 2024
- Due
- 31 Dec 2024
- Delivered
- November 2024
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“BLA filing planned 2H 2024”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company submitted the Biologics License Application (BLA) for RP1 in combination with nivolumab to the FDA in November 2024, which falls within the second half of 2024.
-
A Replimune Group, Inc. 10-Q filed 2025-02-12
“In November 2024, we announced submission of a biologics license application (BLA) to the FDA for RP1 (vusolimogene oderparepvec) in combination with nivolumab” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved +9.0% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (11 Feb 2025 to 14 Feb 2025). What this measures
Checked 1 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 8 Jan 2024
Deadline 31 Dec 2024 (“2H 2024”) · wording expected
-
Version 2 · stated 12 Nov 2024
Deadline 31 Dec 2024 (“before the end of the year”) · wording firm
“remain on track to submit a BLA for RP1 plus nivolumab in anti-PD1 failed melanoma via the accelerated approval pathway before the end of the year”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Regulatory submission
- Indicative materiality
- High rules
- Action
- Submit
- Deliverable
- BLA filing
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
- Depends on
- Regulatory
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Replimune Group, Inc.? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2024-REPL-002726 · Corrections policy