Mid-America Apartment Communities
Begin six property repositioning projects
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 7 Feb 2024
- Due
- 30 Jun 2024
- Checked
- 19 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“An additional six projects will begin in the first half of 2024.”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company explicitly stated in a July 2024 filing that it expected to begin the six repositioning projects in the second half of 2024, rather than the first half as originally committed.
-
A Mid-America Apartment Communities 8-K filed 2024-07-31
“MAA expects to begin six projects under this program in the second half of 2024.” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved +7.8% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (30 Jul 2024 to 2 Aug 2024). What this measures
Checked 19 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- 1 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 7 Feb 2024
Deadline 30 Jun 2024 (“in the first half of 2024”) · wording firm
-
Version 2 · stated 1 May 2024
Deadline 31 Dec 2024 (“the second half of 2024”) · wording expected
“MAA expects to begin six projects under this program in the second half of 2024.”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Project other
- Indicative materiality
- Low rules
- Action
- Begin
- Deliverable
- property repositioning projects
- Language
- Firm (“will”, “on track to”)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
- Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Mid-America Apartment Communities? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2024-MAA-016441 · Corrections policy