Place the Geismar River Terminal project in service
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 17 Apr 2024
- Due
- 31 Dec 2024
- Checked
- 16 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“The approximately $54 million Geismar River Terminal project, which is supported by a long-term commercial commitment, is expected to be in service by the fourth quarter of 2024.”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
A January 2025 8-K, after the Q4 2024 deadline, says the Geismar River Terminal project was delayed by contractor issues to Q1 2025.
-
A Kinder Morgan 8-K filed 2025-01-22
“Due to contractor delays, the project is now expected to be in service in the first quarter of 2025.” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -3.9% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (21 Jan 2025 to 24 Jan 2025). What this measures
Checked 16 Oct 2026.
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- In service
- Indicative materiality
- High rules
- Action
- Place
- Deliverable
- Geismar River Terminal project
- Amount
- USD 54
- Where
- Louisiana
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
- Conditional
- Yes: supported by a long-term commercial commitment
- Depends on
- Customer
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Claude (Anthropic), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Gemini (Google), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
- Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Kinder Morgan? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2024-KMI-009534 · Corrections policy