Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

Kinder Morgan, Inc.

Place the South Texas to Houston Market expansion project in service

Not delivered by the deadline

AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.

Announced
17 Jan 2024
Due
30 Sep 2024
Checked
16 Oct 2026
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“The target in-service date is the third quarter of 2024.”
  • SourceKinder Morgan Form 8-K press release, 2024-01-17
  • FilingSEC filing index
  • Deadline as statedthe third quarter of 2024
  • Deadline used30 Sep 2024, the last day of the stated period
  • TypeProject
  • Permanent referenceKI-C-2024-KMI-009524
    Cite as https://keptindex.org/c/KI-C-2024-KMI-009524/ — this address never changes.

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

An October 2024 filing, after the Q3 2024 deadline, says construction is ongoing and the first phase's target in-service date is Q1 2025, with the second phase in Q3 2025.

  • A
    Kinder Morgan 8-K filed 2024-10-16 Regulatory filing · published 16 Oct 2024 · retrieved 16 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint 4a3269c3ea78
    “The first phase of the project will add compression on Tejas’ mainline, with a target in-service date in the first quarter of 2025.” ✓ confirmed on the page
  • A
    Kinder Morgan 8-K filed 2024-10-16 Regulatory filing · published 16 Oct 2024 · retrieved 16 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint 4a3269c3ea78
    “The expected in-service date for this portion of the project is the third quarter of 2025.” ✓ confirmed on the page
  • A
    Kinder Morgan 10-K filed 2025-02-13 Regulatory filing · published 13 Feb 2025 · retrieved 16 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint 48fdaeac9670
    “First phase expected in-service date is first quarter of 2025.” ✓ confirmed on the page

Market reaction: the shares moved -0.1% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (15 Oct 2024 to 18 Oct 2024). What this measures

Checked 16 Oct 2026.

Commitment lineage

Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.

  • Deadline drift +1369 days
  • Language weakened: firm → expected
  • 5 versions
  1. Version 1 · original · stated 17 Jan 2024

    Deadline 30 Sep 2024 (“the third quarter of 2024”)

  2. Version 2 · stated 17 Apr 2024

    Deadline 31 Mar 2025 (“the first quarter of 2025”)

    “The target in-service date is the first quarter of 2025.”

    Source for this version

  3. Version 3 · stated 16 Oct 2024

    Deadline 31 Mar 2025 (“first quarter of 2025”) · wording firm

    “The first phase of the project will add compression on Tejas’ mainline, with a target in-service date in the first quarter of 2025.”

    Source for this version

  4. Version 4 · stated 16 Oct 2024

    Deadline 30 Sep 2025 (“third quarter of 2025”) · wording expected

    “The expected in-service date for this portion of the project is the third quarter of 2025.”

    Source for this version

  5. Version 5 · stated 22 Jul 2026

    Deadline 30 Jun 2028 (“in the second quarter of 2028”) · wording expected

    “TGP expects the project to be placed in service in the second quarter of 2028.”

    Source for this version

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Project other
Indicative materiality
Low rules
Action
Place
Deliverable
South Texas to Houston Market expansion project
Where
Texas
In the company’s control
High
Specificity
High

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Claude (Anthropic), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: agreesA different AI model, Gemini (Google), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
  4. Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.

Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works

Are you Kinder Morgan? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2024-KMI-009524 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.