Perform module restack at Pepperidge Farm - 1
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 7 Mar 2024
- Due
- 31 Mar 2025
- Checked
- 7 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“Pepperidge Farm - 1 1.4 1 Q1-2025”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
FuelCell Energy did not complete the Pepperidge Farm - 1 module restack by the Q1-2025 deadline, revising the expected date to Q2-2025 in March 2025.
-
A FUELCELL ENERGY INC - Form 8-K - FY2026
“Pepperidge Farm - 1 1.4 1 Q2-2028” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A FUELCELL ENERGY INC - Form 8-K - FY2024
“Pepperidge Farm - 1 1.4 1 Q1-2025” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A FUELCELL ENERGY INC - Form 8-K - FY2025
“Pepperidge Farm - 1 1.4* 1 Q2-2025” ✓ confirmed on the page
Checked 7 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 7 Mar 2024
Deadline 31 Mar 2025 (“Q1-2025”) · target 1.4 MW
-
Version 2 · stated 10 Jun 2024
Deadline 31 Mar 2025 (“Q1-2025”) · target 1 restack
“Pepperidge Farm - 1 1.4 1 Q1-2025”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Project other
- Indicative materiality
- Low rules
- Action
- Perform
- Deliverable
- Module restack
- Target
- 1.4 MW
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
- Depends on
- Customer
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Claude (Anthropic), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Gemini (Google), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
- Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Fuelcell Energy Inc.? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2024-FCEL-002409 · Corrections policy