Submit a BLA for RP1
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 18 May 2023
- Due
- 31 Mar 2024
- Checked
- 1 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“assuming positive primary analysis data demonstrating overall clinical benefit, the Company plans to submit a BLA for RP1 in Q1 2024.”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company did not submit the BLA in Q1 2024 as originally planned, subsequently updating its guidance to a submission in the second half of 2024.
-
A Replimune Group, Inc. 8-K filed 2024-05-16
“The Company completed a successful Type C meeting with the FDA that confirmed alignment on our Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) plans to support our IGNYTE anti-PD1 failed melanoma BLA submission in the 2H 2024.” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A Replimune Group, Inc. 10-K filed 2024-05-16
“we plan to submit a BLA for this cohort in the second half of 2024.” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -12.8% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (15 May 2024 to 20 May 2024). What this measures
Checked 1 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- 1 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 18 May 2023
Deadline 31 Mar 2024 (“Q1 2024”) · wording expected
-
Version 2 · stated 5 Dec 2023
Deadline 31 Dec 2024 (“2H 2024”) · wording expected
“biologics license application (BLA) submission planned for 2H 2024”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Regulatory submission
- Indicative materiality
- High rules
- Action
- Submit
- Deliverable
- BLA submission for RP1
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- Medium
- Specificity
- High
- Conditional
- Yes: assuming positive primary analysis data demonstrating overall clinical benefit
- Depends on
- Regulatory
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
- Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Replimune Group, Inc.? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2023-REPL-002707 · Corrections policy