Deliver SSN 798
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 9 Feb 2023
- Due
- 31 Dec 2024
- Checked
- 12 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“Deliver SSN 798 (Massachusetts)”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company reported that it only 'floated off' the Massachusetts (SSN 798) in 2024, rather than delivering it, indicating the commitment was not met by the 2024 deadline.
-
A Huntington Ingalls Industries 8-K filed 2025-02-06
“Key 2024 Newport News Shipbuilding milestones: •Delivered Virginia-class submarine New Jersey (SSN 796) •Floated off Massachusetts (SSN 798)” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -14.1% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (5 Feb 2025 to 10 Feb 2025). What this measures
Checked 12 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- Deadline drift +730 days
- 4 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 9 Feb 2023
Deadline 31 Dec 2024 (“2024”)
-
Version 2 · stated 4 May 2023
Deadline 31 Dec 2023 (“2023”)
“Deliver SSN 798 (Massachusetts)”
-
Version 3 · stated 1 Aug 2024
Deadline 31 Dec 2025 (“2025”)
“Deliver SSN 798 (Massachusetts)*”
-
Version 4 · stated 6 Feb 2025
Deadline 31 Dec 2026 (“2026”)
“Deliver SSN 798”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Delivery
- Indicative materiality
- Medium rules
- Action
- Deliver
- Deliverable
- SSN 798 (Massachusetts)
- In the company’s control
- Medium
- Specificity
- High
- Conditional
- Yes: subject to change based upon future events
- Depends on
- Customer
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
- Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Huntington Ingalls Industries? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2023-HII-007720 · Corrections policy