Close the Food Ingredients joint venture transaction with Mitsui
Delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 23 Feb 2023
- Due
- 30 Sep 2023
- Delivered
- 27 Sep 2023
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“The parties expect the transaction to close during the third quarter of 2023.”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
Celanese successfully closed the food ingredients joint venture transaction with Mitsui on September 27, 2023, which falls within the third quarter of 2023.
-
A Celanese 10-Q filed 2023-11-08
“On September 27, 2023, the Company formed a food ingredients joint venture with Mitsui & Co., Ltd. ("Mitsui") under the name Nutrinova.” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved +0.8% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (7 Nov 2023 to 10 Nov 2023). What this measures
Checked 20 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- Deadline drift +92 days
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 23 Feb 2023
Deadline 30 Sep 2023 (“during the third quarter of 2023”) · wording expected
-
Version 2 · stated 9 May 2023
Deadline 31 Dec 2023 (“in the second half”) · wording expected
“The transaction is expected to close in the second half”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Acquisition close
- Indicative materiality
- High rules
- Action
- Close
- Deliverable
- Food Ingredients joint venture
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- Medium
- Specificity
- High
- Conditional
- Yes: subject to customary approvals
- Depends on
- Partner, Regulatory
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Celanese? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2023-CE-017417 · Corrections policy