Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

Crown Castle

Deliver approximately 14,000 small cell nodes

Not delivered by the deadline

AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.

Announced
18 Oct 2023
Due
31 Dec 2024
Checked
19 Oct 2026
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“plans to deliver approximately 14,000 small cell nodes”

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

The company did not deliver the 14,000 small cell nodes, as it mutually agreed to cancel approximately 7,000 of those nodes in its contracted backlog during the fourth quarter of 2024.

  • A
    Crown Castle 10-K filed 2025-03-14 Regulatory filing · published 14 Mar 2025 · retrieved 19 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint b4c2fa411a4e
    “during the fourth quarter of 2024, we completed discussions with certain of our tenants regarding approximately 7,000 previously-identified greenfield small cell nodes in our contracted backlog that both parties mutually agreed to cancel.” ✓ confirmed on the page

Market reaction: the shares moved +10.5% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (13 Mar 2025 to 18 Mar 2025). What this measures

Checked 19 Oct 2026.

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Delivery
Indicative materiality
Medium rules
Action
Deliver
Deliverable
14,000 small cell nodes
Target
14,000 nodes
Language
Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
In the company’s control
High
Specificity
High

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
  4. Third check on a negative finding: disagreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and read it as “no_evidence”, so a person decides.

Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works

Are you Crown Castle? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2023-CCI-015638 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.