Place two Fast LNG units into service
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.
- Announced
- 5 May 2022
- Due
- 31 Dec 2023
- Checked
- 2 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“on schedule with construction activities to place 2 Fast LNG units into service in 2023”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company did not place two Fast LNG units into service by the end of 2023; filings indicate the project remained in development throughout 2023 and into 2024.
-
A New Fortress Energy Inc. 10-K filed 2024-02-29
“Assets placed in service during 2023 are primarily comprised of assets to support our Puerto Rican temporary power project and our power plant at the Port of Pichilingue in Baja California Sur, Mexico.” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A New Fortress Energy Inc. 10-K filed 2024-02-29
“Our first Fast LNG unit has been deployed offshore in Altamira, Mexico, and we expect to deploy additional units over the next two years.” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A New Fortress Energy Inc. 10-K filed 2025-03-10
“Cash outflows for investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2023 were used for continued development of our Fast LNG project” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -0.1% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (28 Feb 2024 to 4 Mar 2024). What this measures
Checked 2 Oct 2026.
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- In service
- Indicative materiality
- High rules
- Action
- Place
- Deliverable
- 2 Fast LNG units
- Target
- 2 units
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “Partly met”.
- Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the recorded outcome.
Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works
Are you New Fortress Energy Inc.? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2022-NFE-003850 · Corrections policy