Complete the separation of the Food Safety business
Delivered by the deadline
AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.
- Announced
- 26 Jul 2022
- Due
- 1 Sep 2022
- Delivered
- September 2022
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“3M intends to complete the previously announced separation of Food Safety business through a split-off transaction with a targeted closing date of September 1, 2022”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
3M completed the split-off and combination of its Food Safety Division with Neogen Corporation in September 2022, meeting the targeted closing date.
-
A 3M Co. 10-Q filed 2022-10-25
“In September 2022, 3M completed the split-off and combination of its Food Safety Division business (part of the Health Care business) with Neogen Corporation” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A 3M Co. 10-Q filed 2022-10-25
“Coincident with completion of the September 2022 split-off, the Food Safety business term loan borrowings funded the cash payment to 3M” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved +3.4% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (24 Oct 2022 to 27 Oct 2022). What this measures
Checked 3 Oct 2026.
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Separation
- Indicative materiality
- Transformational rules
- Action
- Complete
- Deliverable
- Separation of Food Safety business
- Language
- Aspirational (“aims”, “intends”)
- In the company’s control
- Medium
- Specificity
- High
- Conditional
- Yes: approval by Neogen shareholders; receipt of required regulatory approvals; satisfaction of other customary closing conditions
- Depends on
- Regulatory, Shareholder
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “no_evidence”.
- Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the second check.
Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works
Are you 3M Co.? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2022-MMM-004472 · Corrections policy