Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

LyondellBasell

Exit the refining business

Not delivered by the deadline

AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.

Announced
29 Apr 2022
Due
31 Dec 2023
Checked
18 Oct 2026
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“Announced plans to exit refining business by the end of 2023”

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

The company continued to incur costs related to its refinery exit strategy well into 2024, indicating the business was not fully exited by the end of 2023 as originally planned.

  • A
    LyondellBasell 10-K filed 2024-02-22 Regulatory filing · published 22 Feb 2024 · retrieved 18 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint b8abce034bce
    “Costs incurred since our decision to exit the refining business through December 31, 2023 were $521 million.” ✓ confirmed on the page
  • A
    LyondellBasell 10-Q filed 2024-08-02 Regulatory filing · published 2 Aug 2024 · retrieved 18 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint e20da46f17e9
    “Total costs incurred since our decision to exit the refining business through June 30, 2024, were $599 million.” ✓ confirmed on the page

Market reaction: the shares moved +1.2% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (1 Aug 2024 to 6 Aug 2024). What this measures

Checked 18 Oct 2026.

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Transaction other
Indicative materiality
Medium rules
Action
Exit
Deliverable
refining business
Language
Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
In the company’s control
High
Specificity
High

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
  4. Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.

Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works

Are you LyondellBasell? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2022-LYB-014979 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.