Complete capacity expansion projects in Idaho and China
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 7 Apr 2022
- Due
- 31 May 2022
- Checked
- 19 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“Our capacity expansions in Idaho and China are on schedule”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company continued to report ongoing investments and construction activities for the Idaho and China capacity expansion projects in filings dated well after the fiscal 2022 deadline.
-
A Lamb Weston 10-K filed 2022-07-27
“We expect capital investments in fiscal 2023 to be approximately $475 million to $525 million, depending on timing of projects, which include among other items: construction of a previously announced french fry production line... in Idaho” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A Lamb Weston 10-K filed 2023-07-25
“Investing activities used $1,340.9 million of cash in fiscal 2023... The increase primarily relates to our investments in our chopped and formed capacity expansion and construction of our french fry processing line in Idaho” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved +0.6% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (26 Jul 2022 to 29 Jul 2022). What this measures
Checked 19 Oct 2026.
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Capacity change
- Indicative materiality
- Medium rules
- Action
- Complete
- Deliverable
- capacity expansions in Idaho and China
- Where
- Idaho and China
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- Medium
- Depends on
- Supplier
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
- Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Lamb Weston? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2022-LW-017220 · Corrections policy