Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

Kinder Morgan, Inc.

Complete the Cumberland Project

Not delivered by the deadline

AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.

Announced
19 Oct 2022
Due
1 Sep 2025
Checked
17 Oct 2026
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“with an expected in-service date of September 1, 2025.”

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

The company's 2026 10-K filing indicates the Cumberland Project's expected in-service date has been delayed to the second quarter of 2030, missing the original September 1, 2025 deadline.

  • A
    Kinder Morgan 10-K filed 2026-02-13 Regulatory filing · published 13 Feb 2026 · retrieved 17 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint 2ae53bca612b
    “Expected in-service date is second quarter of 2030.$430 million TVA Cumberland project” ✓ confirmed on the page

Market reaction: the shares moved +1.2% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (12 Feb 2026 to 18 Feb 2026). What this measures

Checked 17 Oct 2026.

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Construction
Indicative materiality
Medium rules
Action
Complete
Deliverable
Cumberland Project
Where
Tennessee
Language
Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
In the company’s control
Medium
Specificity
High
Conditional
Yes: subject to the completion of TVA’s environmental reviews and final executive approval; pending the receipt of all required permits and clearances
Depends on
Regulatory, Customer

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
  4. Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.

Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works

Are you Kinder Morgan? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2022-KMI-009491 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.