Begin monetizing renewable identification numbers from the new RNG plants
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 19 Jan 2022
- Due
- 31 Mar 2023
- Checked
- 15 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“KMI will begin monetizing renewable identification numbers (RINs) from the new plants in the first quarter of 2023.”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company did not begin monetizing RINs from the new RNG plants in the first quarter of 2023, as it later stated this would occur in the third quarter of 2023.
-
A Kinder Morgan 8-K filed 2023-04-19
“KMI will begin monetizing renewable identification numbers (RINs) from Twin Bridges in the third quarter of 2023.” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -1.4% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (18 Apr 2023 to 21 Apr 2023). What this measures
Checked 15 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- Language weakened: firm → expected
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 19 Jan 2022
Deadline 31 Mar 2023 (“in the first quarter of 2023”) · wording firm
-
Version 2 · stated 20 Jul 2022
Deadline 31 Mar 2023 (“first quarter of 2023”) · wording expected
“KMI expects to begin monetizing renewable identification numbers from the first of the new plants in the first quarter of 2023.”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Other
- Indicative materiality
- Low rules
- Action
- Begin
- Deliverable
- renewable identification numbers
- Language
- Firm (“will”, “on track to”)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
- Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Kinder Morgan? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2022-KMI-009471 · Corrections policy