Close the acquisition of Poly
Delivered by the deadline
AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.
- Announced
- 28 Mar 2022
- Due
- 31 Dec 2022
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“The transaction is expected to close by the end of calendar 2022, subject to Poly stockholder approval, required regulatory clearances, and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions.”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
SEC filings from 2023 confirm the Poly acquisition had already occurred, as the company reported acquisition-related charges and amortization of intangible assets resulting from the transaction.
-
A HP Inc. 10-Q filed 2023-03-01
“Acquisition and divestiture charges increased by $64 million, primarily due to the Poly acquisition. Amortization of Intangible Assets Amortization of intangible assets relates primarily to intangible assets resulting from acquisitions.” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -5.1% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (28 Feb 2023 to 3 Mar 2023). What this measures
Checked 6 Oct 2026.
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Acquisition close
- Indicative materiality
- High rules
- Action
- Close
- Deliverable
- Acquisition of Poly
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- Medium
- Specificity
- High
- Conditional
- Yes: Poly stockholder approval; required regulatory clearances; satisfaction of other customary closing conditions
- Depends on
- Regulatory, Shareholder, Counterparty
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “no_evidence”.
- Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the second check.
Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works
Are you HP Inc.? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2022-HPQ-005027 · Corrections policy