Conduct pre-clinical animal studies for the Terra CoV-2 vaccine IND application
Delivered by the deadline
AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.
- Announced
- 7 Jan 2021
- Due
- 31 Mar 2021
- Delivered
- Q1 2021
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“The initial agreement calls for TQL1055 to be used in pre-clinical animal studies supporting the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application expected to be conducted during the first quarter of”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company confirmed it conducted pre-clinical animal studies, including hamster virus challenge and mouse immunogenicity studies, which were completed to support the vaccine development program.
-
A Oragenics Inc. 10-K filed 2022-03-24
“We have conducted the pre-clinical studies including the Syrian Hamster virus challenge study, the mouse immunogenicity study with positive results for both the intramuscular formulation (Terra CoV-2) and the intranasal formulation (NT-CoV2-1).” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -13.5% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (23 Mar 2022 to 28 Mar 2022). What this measures
Checked 24 Oct 2026.
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Project other
- Indicative materiality
- Low rules
- Action
- Conduct
- Deliverable
- pre-clinical animal studies
- Where
- U.S.
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
- Conditional
- Yes: subject to material transfer agreement
- Depends on
- Regulatory
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “no_evidence”.
- Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the second check.
Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works
Are you Oragenics Inc.? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2021-OGEN-021312 · Corrections policy