Make an investment decision for the Yanacocha Sulfides project
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 29 Apr 2021
- Due
- 31 Dec 2021
- Checked
- 18 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“An investment decision is expected in the second half of 2021”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
Newmont did not make the investment decision for the Yanacocha Sulfides project by the end of 2021; subsequent filings indicate the decision was delayed to late 2022.
-
A Newmont 8-K filed 2022-02-24
“Total capital costs for the project are estimated at $2.5 billion, with an investment decision expected in late 2022” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -6.5% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (23 Feb 2022 to 28 Feb 2022). What this measures
Checked 18 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- Deadline drift +1096 days
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 29 Apr 2021
Deadline 31 Dec 2021 (“in the second half of 2021”) · wording expected
-
Version 2 · stated 28 Oct 2021
Deadline 31 Dec 2022 (“second half of 2022”) · wording expected
“full funds decision expected in the second half of 2022”
-
Version 3 · stated 27 Apr 2023
Deadline 31 Dec 2024 (“late 2024”) · wording expected
“investment decision planned for late 2024”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Project other
- Indicative materiality
- Low rules
- Action
- Make
- Deliverable
- Yanacocha Sulfides investment decision
- Where
- South America
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
- Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Newmont? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2021-NEM-015219 · Corrections policy