Place the Acadiana expansion project in full service

Delivered by the deadline

Under re-examination This entry has been challenged and is being re-checked against the sources.

What the company said

“full in-service expected in the fourth quarter of 2021”

SourceKinder Morgan Form 8-K press release, 2021-10-20
FilingSEC filing index
Deadline as statedthe fourth quarter of 2021
Deadline used31 Dec 2021, the last day of the stated period
TypeProject
Permanent referenceKI-C-2021-KMI-009458
Cite as https://keptindex.org/c/KI-C-2021-KMI-009458/ — this address never changes.

The Acadiana expansion project was placed in full service on October 20, 2021, which is within the fourth quarter of 2021 deadline.

A
Kinder Morgan 8-K filed 2022-01-19 Regulatory filing · published 19 Jan 2022 · retrieved 13 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC
“Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline’s approximately $127 million Acadiana expansion project was placed in full service on October 20, 2021, ahead of schedule.” ✓ confirmed on the page

Checked 13 Oct 2026.

Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.

Version 1 · original · stated 20 Oct 2021

Deadline 31 Dec 2021 (“the fourth quarter of 2021”) · wording expected
Version 2 · stated 17 Jan 2024

Deadline 30 Nov 2024 (“in November 2024”) · wording expected

“The project is currently expected to be placed in service in November 2024.”
Source for this version
Version 3 · stated 17 Apr 2024

Deadline 30 Nov 2024 (“November 2024”) · wording firm

“The project is currently on track to be placed in service in November 2024.”
Source for this version
Version 4 · stated 17 Jul 2024

Deadline 31 Dec 2028 (“late 2028”) · wording expected

“Subject to all required approvals, KMI expects the project to be in service beginning in late 2028.”
Source for this version

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.

Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works

Are you Kinder Morgan? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.