Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

Intel Corp.

Begin production of Sapphire Rapids for the data center

Not delivered by the deadline

AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.

Announced
26 Jul 2021
Due
31 Mar 2022
Checked
2 Oct 2026
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“Sapphire Rapids for the data center, which is expected to be in production in the first quarter of 2022.”
  • SourceIntel Corp. Form 8-K press release, 2021-07-26
  • FilingSEC filing index
  • Deadline as statedin the first quarter of 2022
  • Deadline used31 Mar 2022, the last day of the stated period
  • TypeProduct
  • Permanent referenceKI-C-2021-INTC-004184
    Cite as https://keptindex.org/c/KI-C-2021-INTC-004184/ — this address never changes.

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

Intel failed to begin production of Sapphire Rapids by the first quarter of 2022, announcing in July 2022 that the ramp would occur later in the year than previously forecasted.

  • A
    Intel Corp. 10-Q filed 2022-07-29 Regulatory filing · published 29 Jul 2022 · retrieved 2 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint 771ccb1bc2eb
    “We announced that the ramp of Sapphire Rapids is expected to occur later in the year than previously forecasted” ✓ confirmed on the page

Market reaction: the shares moved -9.8% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (28 Jul 2022 to 2 Aug 2022). What this measures

Checked 2 Oct 2026.

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Production start
Indicative materiality
High rules
Action
Begin
Deliverable
Sapphire Rapids data center product
Language
Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
In the company’s control
High
Specificity
High

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
  4. Third check on a negative finding: disagreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and read it as “no_evidence”, so a person decides.

Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works

Are you Intel Corp.? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2021-INTC-004184 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.