Complete sea trials for DDG 125 (Jack H. Lucas)
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.
- Announced
- 11 Feb 2021
- Due
- 31 Dec 2022
- Checked
- 12 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“Complete sea trials DDG 125 (Jack H. Lucas)”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company did not complete sea trials for the Jack H. Lucas (DDG 125) in 2022; filings indicate the ship was delivered in 2023.
-
A Huntington Ingalls Industries 8-K filed 2023-02-09
“Successfully completed builder’s trials for guided-missile destroyer Jack H. Lucas (DDG 125)” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A Huntington Ingalls Industries 10-Q filed 2023-08-03
“We delivered USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117), USS Delbert D. Black (DDG 119), USS Frank E. Petersen Jr. (DDG 121), USS Lenah H. Sutcliffe Higbee (DDG 123), and Jack H. Lucas (DDG 125) in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively.” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved +1.1% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (2 Aug 2023 to 7 Aug 2023). What this measures
Checked 12 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- Deadline drift +365 days
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 11 Feb 2021
Deadline 31 Dec 2022 (“2022”)
-
Version 2 · stated 4 May 2023
Deadline 31 Dec 2023 (“2023”)
“Complete sea trials and deliver DDG 125 (Jack H. Lucas)”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Clinical milestone
- Indicative materiality
- Medium rules
- Action
- Complete
- Deliverable
- DDG 125 sea trials
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
- Conditional
- Yes: subject to change based upon future events
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “Met”.
- Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the second check.
Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works
Are you Huntington Ingalls Industries? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2021-HII-007653 · Corrections policy