Close approximately 350 North American Gap and Banana Republic stores
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 26 Aug 2021
- Due
- 29 Jan 2022
- Checked
- 21 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“On-track to close ~350 N.A. Gap and Banana Republic stores by end of FY23”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company failed to close the targeted 350 stores by the end of fiscal year 2023, having closed 304 stores by January 28, 2023.
-
A Gap 10-K filed 2023-03-14
“The Company is also continuing to reduce the number of Gap and Banana Republic stores in North America by approximately 350 stores from the beginning of fiscal 2020 to the end of fiscal 2023. As of January 28, 2023, we have closed, net of openings, 304 Gap and Banana Republic stores” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -6.1% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (13 Mar 2023 to 16 Mar 2023). What this measures
Checked 21 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- Deadline drift +733 days
- Scope drift 0.0%
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 26 Aug 2021
Deadline 29 Jan 2022 (“by end of FY23”) · target 350 stores
-
Version 2 · stated 23 Nov 2021
Deadline 1 Feb 2024 (“by end of FY23”) · target 350 stores
“On-track to close ~350 N.A. Gap and Banana Republic stores by end of FY23”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Facility other
- Indicative materiality
- Medium rules
- Action
- Close
- Deliverable
- North American Gap and Banana Republic store closures
- Target
- 350 stores
- Where
- North America
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
- Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Gap? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2021-GAP-019049 · Corrections policy