Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

iTeos Therapeutics, Inc.

Report safety data for Inupadenant and pembrolizumab in melanoma

Not delivered by the deadline

AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.

Announced
11 Jan 2021
Due
30 Jun 2021
Checked
24 Oct 2026
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“Safety 2Q 2021”

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

The company reported monotherapy data in 2Q 2021, but filings indicate the combination trial with pembrolizumab in melanoma was still ongoing or in expansion phases well after the deadline.

  • A
    iTeos Therapeutics, Inc. 10-Q filed 2021-08-11 Regulatory filing · published 11 Aug 2021 · retrieved 24 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint 564c5368812d
    “In June 2021, we reported additional data from monotherapy expansion cohorts at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting.” ✓ confirmed on the page
  • A
    iTeos Therapeutics, Inc. 10-Q filed 2021-11-10 Regulatory filing · published 10 Nov 2021 · retrieved 24 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint f34582b21bee
    “We have also initiated an expansion arm evaluating inupadenant in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with PD-1-resistant melanoma.” ✓ confirmed on the page

Checked 24 Oct 2026.

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Clinical readout
Indicative materiality
Medium rules
Action
Report
Deliverable
Inupadenant and pembrolizumab safety data
In the company’s control
Medium
Specificity
High
Depends on
Regulatory, Customer

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
  4. Third check on a negative finding: disagreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and read it as “no_evidence”, so a person decides.

Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works

Are you iTeos Therapeutics, Inc.? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2021-C808865-021555 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.