Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

Piedmont Lithium Ltd

Finalize permitting for the Piedmont Lithium Project

Not delivered by the deadline

AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.

Announced
11 Jan 2021
Due
31 Dec 2021
Checked
25 Oct 2026
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“2021 will be an important year for our Piedmont Lithium Project, as we plan to ... finalize permitting”

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

The company did not finalize permitting by the end of 2021; filings from 2022 indicate that permitting activities were ongoing, including a request for additional information received in January 2022.

  • A
    Piedmont Lithium Ltd 10-Q filed 2022-05-06 Regulatory filing · published 6 May 2022 · retrieved 25 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint 7ced5d05d66c
    “In January 2022, we received a second request for additional information from the North Carolina’s Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (DEMLR) in relation to our mine permit application initially submitted in August 2021.” ✓ confirmed on the page

Checked 25 Oct 2026.

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Regulatory other
Indicative materiality
Medium rules
Action
Finalize
Deliverable
Permitting for Piedmont Lithium Project
Where
North Carolina
Language
Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
In the company’s control
Medium
Specificity
Medium
Depends on
Regulatory

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
  4. Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.

Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works

Are you Piedmont Lithium Ltd? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2021-C728205-021869 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.