Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

Biogen

Submit filing for zuranolone for postpartum depression

Delivered by the deadline

AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.

Announced
20 Oct 2021
Due
30 Jun 2023
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“an additional filing for postpartum depression (PPD) is anticipated in the first half of 2023”
  • SourceBiogen Form 8-K press release, 2021-10-20
  • FilingSEC filing index
  • Deadline as statedin the first half of 2023
  • Deadline used30 Jun 2023, the last day of the stated period
  • TypeRegulatory
  • Permanent referenceKI-C-2021-BIIB-005343
    Cite as https://keptindex.org/c/KI-C-2021-BIIB-005343/ — this address never changes.

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

The FDA accepted the zuranolone NDA and granted Priority Review in February 2023, implying the filing was submitted before the June 2023 deadline.

  • A
    Biogen 10-Q filed 2023-07-25 Regulatory filing · published 25 Jul 2023 · retrieved 10 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint f02fd7606b38
    “In February 2023 the FDA accepted the NDA and granted Priority Review for zuranolone.” ✓ confirmed on the page

Market reaction: the shares moved -4.8% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (24 Jul 2023 to 27 Jul 2023). What this measures

Checked 10 Oct 2026.

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Regulatory filing
Indicative materiality
Medium rules
Action
Submit
Deliverable
filing for zuranolone for postpartum depression
Language
Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
In the company’s control
High
Specificity
High
Depends on
Regulatory

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Claude (Anthropic), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: disagreesGemini (Google) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “no_evidence”.
  4. Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the second check.

Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works

Are you Biogen? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2021-BIIB-005343 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.