Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

Adma Biologics, Inc.

File Biologics License Applications for two additional plasma collection centers

Not delivered by the deadline

AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.

Announced
19 Jan 2021
Due
31 Dec 2021
Checked
25 Oct 2026
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“ADMA also anticipates filing BLAs for two additional plasma collection centers during 2021.”

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

The company did not report filing BLAs for two additional plasma collection centers during 2021; subsequent filings indicate only one facility had a pending BLA as of early 2022.

  • A
    Adma Biologics, Inc. 10-K filed 2022-03-24 Regulatory filing · published 24 Mar 2022 · retrieved 25 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint abcbf68c917a
    “We also have one other plasma collection facility where we currently collect plasma for which a BLA is pending with the FDA.” ✓ confirmed on the page

Market reaction: the shares moved +17.8% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (23 Mar 2022 to 28 Mar 2022). What this measures

Checked 25 Oct 2026.

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Regulatory submission
Indicative materiality
High rules
Action
File
Deliverable
BLAs for two plasma collection centers
Language
Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
In the company’s control
High
Specificity
High
Depends on
Regulatory

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “no_evidence”.
  4. Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the second check.

Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works

Are you Adma Biologics, Inc.? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2021-ADMA-022164 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.