Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

Take-Two Interactive

Complete the acquisition of Codemasters Group Holdings PLC

Not delivered by the deadline

AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.

Announced
10 Nov 2020
Due
31 Mar 2021
Checked
17 Oct 2026
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“The acquisition is anticipated to be completed in the first quarter of calendar 2021.”

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

The company's filings refer to its 'offer to acquire' Codemasters, but do not confirm completion of the acquisition, and outside knowledge confirms Electronic Arts acquired Codemasters instead.

  • A
    Take-Two Interactive 10-K filed 2021-05-19 Regulatory filing · published 19 May 2021 · retrieved 17 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint 98db5e3346f9
    “professional fees related to consulting, including for our acquisition of Playdots and our offer to acquire Codemasters Group Holdings PLC” ✓ confirmed on the page

Market reaction: the shares moved +9.2% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (18 May 2021 to 21 May 2021). What this measures

Checked 17 Oct 2026.

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Acquisition close
Indicative materiality
High rules
Action
Complete
Deliverable
Acquisition of Codemasters Group Holdings PLC
Where
UK
Language
Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
In the company’s control
Medium
Specificity
High
Conditional
Yes: receipt of all required regulatory approvals
Depends on
Regulatory, Counterparty

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
  4. Third check on a negative finding: disagreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and read it as “no_evidence”, so a person decides.

Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works

Are you Take-Two Interactive? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2020-TTWO-012153 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.