Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

Mid-America Apartment Communities

Stabilize one apartment community

Not delivered by the deadline

AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.

Announced
28 Oct 2020
Due
30 Jun 2021
Checked
19 Oct 2026
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“the other property is expected to stabilize in the second quarter of 2021.”

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

The company reported in July 2021 that two properties were still in initial lease-up as of the end of the second quarter of 2021, indicating the stabilization commitment was not met.

  • A
    Mid-America Apartment Communities 8-K filed 2021-07-28 Regulatory filing · published 28 Jul 2021 · retrieved 19 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint f67e685eb6df
    “As of the end of the second quarter of 2021, MAA had two properties in their initial lease-up with physical occupancy averaging 69.7%. One property is expected to stabilize in the third quarter of 2021 and the other property is expected to stabilize in the second quarter of 2022.” ✓ confirmed on the page

Market reaction: the shares moved +2.7% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (27 Jul 2021 to 30 Jul 2021). What this measures

Checked 19 Oct 2026.

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Project other
Indicative materiality
Low rules
Action
Stabilize
Deliverable
apartment community
Language
Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
In the company’s control
High
Specificity
High

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
  4. Third check on a negative finding: disagreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and read it as “Met”, so a person decides.

Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works

Are you Mid-America Apartment Communities? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2020-MAA-016354 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.