Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

Mid-America Apartment Communities

Stabilize one apartment community

Not delivered by the deadline

AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.

Announced
28 Oct 2020
Due
31 Dec 2020
Checked
19 Oct 2026
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“One property is expected to stabilize in the fourth quarter of 2020”

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

The company did not stabilize the property in the fourth quarter of 2020 as expected; instead, it reported that the property was expected to stabilize in the second quarter of 2021.

  • A
    Mid-America Apartment Communities 8-K filed 2021-02-03 Regulatory filing · published 3 Feb 2021 · retrieved 19 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint 157f74325fd1
    “As of the end of the fourth quarter of 2020, MAA had one property in its initial lease-up with physical occupancy of 79.8%. That property is expected to stabilize in the second quarter of 2021.” ✓ confirmed on the page

Market reaction: the shares moved -2.2% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (2 Feb 2021 to 5 Feb 2021). What this measures

Checked 19 Oct 2026.

Commitment lineage

Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.

  • Deadline drift +1369 days
  • 5 versions
  1. Version 1 · original · stated 28 Oct 2020

    Deadline 31 Dec 2020 (“in the fourth quarter of 2020”) · wording expected

  2. Version 2 · stated 2 Feb 2022

    Deadline 31 Mar 2022 (“in the first quarter of 2022”) · wording expected

    “One community is expected to stabilize in the first quarter of 2022”

    Source for this version

  3. Version 3 · stated 2 Feb 2022

    Deadline 30 Sep 2022 (“in the third quarter of 2022”)

    “one in the third quarter of 2022”

    Source for this version

  4. Version 4 · stated 2 Feb 2022

    Deadline 31 Mar 2023 (“in the first quarter of 2023”)

    “one in the first quarter of 2023.”

    Source for this version

  5. Version 5 · stated 27 Apr 2022

    Deadline 30 Sep 2022 (“in the third quarter of 2022”) · wording expected

    “One community is expected to stabilize in the third quarter of 2022”

    Source for this version

  6. Version 6 · stated 27 Apr 2022

    Deadline 31 Dec 2022 (“in the fourth quarter of 2022”)

    “one in the fourth quarter of 2022”

    Source for this version

  7. Version 7 · stated 26 Apr 2023

    Deadline 30 Jun 2023 (“in the second quarter of 2023”) · wording expected

    “One community is expected to stabilize in the second quarter of 2023”

    Source for this version

  8. Version 8 · stated 26 Apr 2023

    Deadline 31 Dec 2023 (“in the fourth quarter of 2023”)

    “one in the fourth quarter of 2023”

    Source for this version

  9. Version 9 · stated 1 May 2024

    Deadline 31 Dec 2024 (“the fourth quarter of 2024”) · wording expected

    “one is expected to stabilize in the fourth quarter of 2024”

    Source for this version

  10. Version 10 · stated 31 Jul 2024

    Deadline 30 Sep 2024 (“in the third quarter of 2024”) · wording expected

    “One community is expected to stabilize in the third quarter of 2024”

    Source for this version

  11. Version 11 · stated 31 Jul 2024

    Deadline 31 Mar 2025 (“in the first quarter of 2025”) · wording expected

    “one is expected to stabilize in the first quarter of 2025”

    Source for this version

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Project other
Indicative materiality
Low rules
Action
Stabilize
Deliverable
apartment community
Language
Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
In the company’s control
High
Specificity
High

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
  4. Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.

Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works

Are you Mid-America Apartment Communities? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2020-MAA-016353 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.