Mid-America Apartment Communities
Reposition 10 properties
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.
- Announced
- 28 Feb 2020
- Due
- 31 Dec 2020
- Checked
- 19 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“10 properties planned for 2020”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company reported that repositioning work continued at eight properties for the year ended December 31, 2020, falling short of the stated goal to reposition 10 properties during that year.
-
A Mid-America Apartment Communities 8-K filed 2021-02-03
“During the fourth quarter of 2020, repositioning work continued at eight of these properties. For the year ended December 31, 2020, MAA spent $13.0 million on this program.” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -2.2% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (2 Feb 2021 to 5 Feb 2021). What this measures
Checked 19 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- Scope drift -20.0%
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 28 Feb 2020
Deadline 31 Dec 2020 (“for 2020”) · target 10 properties · wording expected
-
Version 2 · stated 1 Sep 2020
Deadline 31 Dec 2020 (“2020”) · target 8 properties · wording expected
“8 properties planned for 2020”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Project other
- Indicative materiality
- Low rules
- Action
- Reposition
- Deliverable
- Repositioned properties
- Target
- 10 properties
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “no_evidence”.
- Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the second check.
Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works
Are you Mid-America Apartment Communities? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2020-MAA-016336 · Corrections policy