Submit NDA for ruxolitinib cream in atopic dermatitis to regulators
Delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 13 Feb 2020
- Due
- 31 Dec 2020
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“The NDA submission, seeking approval of ruxolitinib cream in atopic dermatitis, is expected in the fourth quarter of 2020 following long-term safety and efficacy data from both pivotal trials.”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
An 8-K filed 2021-02-09 says the atopic dermatitis NDA was submitted to the FDA late in Q4 2020, within the stated quarter.
-
A Incyte 8-K filed 2021-02-09
“the NDA seeking approval of ruxolitinib cream as a treatment for patients with atopic dermatitis was submitted to the FDA late in the fourth quarter of 2020, including use of the previously acquired priority review voucher (PRV).” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -9.3% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (8 Feb 2021 to 11 Feb 2021). What this measures
Checked 10 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 13 Feb 2020
Deadline 31 Dec 2020 (“in the fourth quarter of 2020”) · wording expected
-
Version 2 · stated 5 May 2020
Deadline 31 Dec 2020 (“at the end of 2020”) · wording firm
“we are also on track to submit the NDA for ruxolitinib cream at the end of 2020”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Regulatory submission
- Indicative materiality
- High rules
- Action
- Submit
- Deliverable
- NDA for ruxolitinib cream in atopic dermatitis
- Where
- US
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
- Conditional
- Yes: following long-term safety and efficacy data from both pivotal trials
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Claude (Anthropic), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Gemini (Google), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Incyte? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2020-INCY-005668 · Corrections policy