Re-deliver CVN 73 (USS George Washington)
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 13 Feb 2020
- Due
- 31 Dec 2020
- Checked
- 12 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“Re-deliver CVN 73 (USS George Washington)”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company's filings from 2021 confirm that the RCOH of USS George Washington (CVN 73) was still ongoing after the 2020 deadline, indicating the commitment was not met by the end of 2020.
-
A Huntington Ingalls Industries 10-K filed 2021-02-11
“We are currently performing the RCOH of USS George Washington (CVN 73).” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved +3.8% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (10 Feb 2021 to 16 Feb 2021). What this measures
Checked 12 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- Deadline drift +1095 days
- 3 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 13 Feb 2020
Deadline 31 Dec 2020 (“2020”)
-
Version 2 · stated 11 Feb 2021
Deadline 31 Dec 2022 (“2022”)
“Re-deliver CVN 73 (USS George Washington)”
-
Version 3 · stated 4 May 2023
Deadline 31 Dec 2023 (“2023”)
“Re-deliver CVN 73 (USS George Washington)”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Delivery
- Indicative materiality
- Medium rules
- Action
- Re-deliver
- Deliverable
- CVN 73 (USS George Washington)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
- Depends on
- Customer, Government
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
- Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Huntington Ingalls Industries? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2020-HII-007624 · Corrections policy