Begin customer deliveries of the G700 aircraft
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 29 Jan 2020
- Due
- 31 Dec 2022
- Checked
- 1 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“scheduled to begin customer deliveries in 2022”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
General Dynamics did not begin G700 customer deliveries in 2022; subsequent filings indicate the aircraft was still awaiting certification and entry into service throughout 2023.
-
A General Dynamics Corp. 10-K filed 2023-02-07
“This outlook assumes the certification and entry into service of the new G700 aircraft.” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A General Dynamics Corp. 10-Q filed 2023-04-26
“including the G700 in anticipation of its certification from the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration in the summer of 2023” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A General Dynamics Corp. 10-K filed 2024-02-08
“We expect the Aerospace segment’s 2024 revenue to increase to approximately $12 billion due to an increase in new aircraft deliveries to approximately 160, including the entry into service of the new G700 aircraft.” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -0.9% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (6 Feb 2023 to 9 Feb 2023). What this measures
Checked 1 Oct 2026.
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Production start
- Indicative materiality
- High rules
- Action
- Begin
- Deliverable
- G700 aircraft customer deliveries
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
- Depends on
- Customer
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
- Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you General Dynamics Corp.? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2020-GD-001745 · Corrections policy