Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

Avery Dennison

Work through backlogs

Delivered by the deadline

AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.

Announced
29 Apr 2020
Due
30 Jun 2020
Delivered
June 2020
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“expect to work through backlogs by end of Q2”

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

The company reported that backlogs resulting from demand surges in mid-March through April carried into early June, but demand slowed later in June, indicating the backlogs were addressed by the end of Q2.

  • A
    Avery Dennison 8-K filed 2020-07-27 Regulatory filing · published 27 Jul 2020 · retrieved 18 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint 684d23483750
    “The company’s operations in Europe and North America experienced significant demand surges in mid-March through April, resulting in backlogs that carried into early June... Demand for these categories slowed later in June” ✓ confirmed on the page

Market reaction: the shares moved -3.4% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (24 Jul 2020 to 29 Jul 2020). What this measures

Checked 18 Oct 2026.

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Other
Indicative materiality
Low rules
Action
Work
Deliverable
backlogs
Language
Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
In the company’s control
Medium
Specificity
Medium
Depends on
Customer

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “no_evidence”.
  4. Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the second check.

Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works

Are you Avery Dennison? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2020-AVY-014505 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.