Complete the Cirrus community construction
Delivered by the deadline
AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.
- Announced
- 29 Oct 2019
- Due
- 31 Mar 2022
- Delivered
- Q1 2022
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“Cirrus... is expected to be completed during the first quarter of 2022.”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company confirmed in an April 2022 filing that it delivered initial apartment homes at the Cirrus community during the first quarter of 2022, meeting the stated completion timeline.
-
A UDR, Inc. 8-K filed 2022-04-26
“During the first quarter, the Company delivered initial apartment homes at Cirrus (Denver, CO)...” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -2.6% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (25 Apr 2022 to 28 Apr 2022). What this measures
Checked 19 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- Deadline drift +91 days
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 29 Oct 2019
Deadline 31 Mar 2022 (“during the first quarter of 2022”) · wording expected
-
Version 2 · stated 11 Feb 2020
Deadline 30 Jun 2022 (“during the second quarter of 2022”) · target 220 homes · wording expected
“Dublin, a 220-home community in Dublin, CA... is expected to be completed during the second quarter of 2022.”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Construction
- Indicative materiality
- Medium rules
- Action
- Complete
- Deliverable
- Cirrus community
- Where
- Denver, CO
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “no_evidence”.
- Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and reads it as “Not met”.
Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works
Are you UDR, Inc.? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2019-UDR-016792 · Corrections policy