Complete the new PO/TBA plant
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 1 Feb 2019
- Due
- 31 Dec 2021
- Checked
- 18 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“continued construction on our new PO/TBA plant which is on track for completion in 2021.”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company continued to report capital expenditure commitments related to the construction of the PO/TBA plant well into 2022, indicating the project was not completed by the end of 2021.
-
A LyondellBasell 10-K filed 2022-02-24
“As of December 31, 2021, we had capital expenditure commitments, which we incurred in our normal course of business, including commitments of approximately $276 million related to building our new PO/TBA plant” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A LyondellBasell 10-Q filed 2022-04-29
“As of March 31, 2022, we had capital expenditure commitments, which we incurred in our normal course of business, including commitments of approximately $366 million related to building our new PO/TBA plant” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -4.7% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (23 Feb 2022 to 28 Feb 2022). What this measures
Checked 18 Oct 2026.
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Facility other
- Indicative materiality
- Medium rules
- Action
- Complete
- Deliverable
- PO/TBA plant
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
- Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you LyondellBasell? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2019-LYB-014974 · Corrections policy