Launch LPD 28 (Fort Lauderdale)
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.
- Announced
- 1 Aug 2019
- Due
- 31 Dec 2020
- Checked
- 12 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“Launch of LPD 28 (Fort Lauderdale)”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company's SEC filings from 2021 indicate that the Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28) was still under construction well into 2021, confirming it was not launched by the end of 2020.
-
A Huntington Ingalls Industries 10-K filed 2021-02-11
“we are currently constructing Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28)” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A Huntington Ingalls Industries 10-Q filed 2021-05-06
“We are currently constructing Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28)” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved +3.8% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (10 Feb 2021 to 16 Feb 2021). What this measures
Checked 12 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- Deadline drift +730 days
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 1 Aug 2019
Deadline 31 Dec 2020 (“2020”)
-
Version 2 · stated 11 Feb 2021
Deadline 31 Dec 2022 (“2022”)
“Deliver LPD 28 (Fort Lauderdale)”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Commercial launch
- Indicative materiality
- Medium rules
- Action
- Launch
- Deliverable
- LPD 28 (Fort Lauderdale)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
- Depends on
- Customer
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “no_evidence”.
- Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the second check.
Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works
Are you Huntington Ingalls Industries? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2019-HII-007610 · Corrections policy