Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

Huntington Ingalls Industries

Launch DDG 123 (Lenah H. Sutcliffe Higbee)

Not delivered by the deadline

AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.

Announced
1 Aug 2019
Due
31 Dec 2020
Checked
12 Oct 2026
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“Launch of DDG 123 (Lenah H. Sutcliffe Higbee)”

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

The company's SEC filings through early 2022 indicate that DDG 123 (Lenah H. Sutcliffe Higbee) was still under construction and had not been delivered or launched by the end of 2020.

  • A
    Huntington Ingalls Industries 10-K filed 2021-02-11 Regulatory filing · published 11 Feb 2021 · retrieved 12 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint 666bc7053cce
    “We are currently constructing the remaining three ships: Frank E. Petersen Jr. (DDG 121), Lenah H. Sutcliffe Higbee (DDG 123), and Jack H. Lucas (DDG 125).” ✓ confirmed on the page
  • A
    Huntington Ingalls Industries 10-K filed 2022-02-10 Regulatory filing · published 10 Feb 2022 · retrieved 12 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint 962de1b1b83b
    “We are currently constructing the remaining two ships: Lenah H. Sutcliffe Higbee (DDG 123) and Jack H.” ✓ confirmed on the page

Market reaction: the shares moved +3.8% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (10 Feb 2021 to 16 Feb 2021). What this measures

Checked 12 Oct 2026.

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Commercial launch
Indicative materiality
Medium rules
Action
Launch
Deliverable
DDG 123 (Lenah H. Sutcliffe Higbee)
In the company’s control
High
Specificity
High
Depends on
Customer

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “no_evidence”.
  4. Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the second check.

Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works

Are you Huntington Ingalls Industries? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2019-HII-007608 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.