Deliver DDG 121 (Frank E. Petersen Jr.)
Delivered after the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 1 Aug 2019
- Due
- 31 Dec 2020
- Delivered
- by 1 Jan 2021
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“Delivery of DDG 121 (Frank E. Petersen Jr.)”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company delivered the DDG 121 (Frank E. Petersen Jr.) in 2021, which is after the 2020 deadline.
-
A Huntington Ingalls Industries 10-K filed 2022-02-10
“We have delivered 33 Arleigh Burke class (DDG 51) destroyers to the U.S. Navy, including Frank E. Petersen Jr. (DDG 121) in 2021” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A Huntington Ingalls Industries 10-K filed 2022-02-10
“We delivered USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117), USS Delbert D. Black (DDG 119), and Frank E. Petersen Jr. (DDG 121) in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively.” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved +0.9% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (9 Feb 2022 to 14 Feb 2022). What this measures
Checked 12 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- Deadline drift +730 days
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 1 Aug 2019
Deadline 31 Dec 2020 (“2020”)
-
Version 2 · stated 11 Feb 2021
Deadline 31 Dec 2022 (“2022”)
“Deliver DDG 121 (Frank E. Petersen Jr.)”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Delivery
- Indicative materiality
- Medium rules
- Action
- Deliver
- Deliverable
- DDG 121 (Frank E. Petersen Jr.)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
- Depends on
- Customer
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you Huntington Ingalls Industries? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2019-HII-007607 · Corrections policy