Remediate challenging accounts in Europe
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.
- Announced
- 6 Nov 2019
- Due
- 31 Dec 2020
- Checked
- 19 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“a couple of challenging accounts in Europe, which are expected to be remediated in 2020”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company reported ongoing efforts to remediate material weaknesses in the EMEA region throughout 2020 and into 2021, indicating the remediation was not completed by the 2020 deadline.
-
A Cbre Group 10-K filed 2021-02-24
“During the year ended December 31, 2020, investments were also made in both people and technology associated with ongoing efforts to remediate material weaknesses in our Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) region.” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A Cbre Group 10-Q filed 2021-04-29
“support investments related to our ongoing efforts to remediate material weaknesses in our Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) region.” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A Cbre Group 10-K filed 2022-03-01
“We made significant progress during the prior and the current fiscal year and remediated certain material weaknesses.” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -0.9% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (23 Feb 2021 to 26 Feb 2021). What this measures
Checked 19 Oct 2026.
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Project other
- Indicative materiality
- Low rules
- Action
- Remediate
- Deliverable
- challenging accounts in Europe
- Where
- Europe
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- Low
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “Late”.
- Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the recorded outcome.
Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works
Are you Cbre Group? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2019-CBRE-015597 · Corrections policy