Complete the Pasadena terminal
Delivered by the deadline
AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.
- Announced
- 3 Jan 2018
- Due
- 31 Mar 2020
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“Pasadena terminal (early 2020)”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
Later 10-Q filings state that completion of the initial two construction phases of the Pasadena terminal occurred in the first quarter of 2020, within the early-2020 deadline.
-
A Valero Energy 10-Q filed 2020-04-29
“upon completion of the initial two phases of construction, which occurred in the first quarter of 2020.” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A Valero Energy 10-Q filed 2020-07-31
“upon completion of the initial two phases of construction, which occurred in the first quarter of 2020.” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A Valero Energy 10-K filed 2021-02-23
“upon completion of construction of the terminal, which occurred in the first quarter of 2020.” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved +2.6% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (28 Apr 2020 to 1 May 2020). What this measures
Checked 15 Oct 2026.
Commitment lineage
Every time the company restated this commitment. The original is never changed, and the outcome is always measured against version 1.
- Deadline drift +275 days
- 2 versions
-
Version 1 · original · stated 3 Jan 2018
Deadline 31 Mar 2020 (“early 2020”)
-
Version 2 · stated 25 Apr 2019
Deadline 31 Dec 2020 (“in 2020”) · wording firm
“The Pasadena terminal, St. Charles alkylation unit, and Pembroke cogeneration unit are all on track to be complete in 2020.”
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Project other
- Indicative materiality
- Low rules
- Action
- Complete
- Deliverable
- Pasadena terminal
- Where
- Pasadena
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Claude (Anthropic), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Gemini (Google), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works
Are you Valero Energy? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2018-VLO-010405 · Corrections policy