Skip to content

Person-checked company records fromPerson-checked records $750See a worked exampleHuman review in progress

Talk to sales

KeptIndex

Quanta Services

Reach substantial completion of the Site C Transmission Line project

Not delivered by the deadline

AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.

Announced
2 Aug 2018
Due
30 Jun 2022
Checked
13 Oct 2026
  • Deadline
  • Met
  • Late
  • Not met
  • Today

What the company said

“the project is expected to reach substantial completion in the second quarter of 2022.”

What we found

Evidence strength A What the grades mean

While one electric infrastructure project was completed in Q1 2022, the large renewable transmission project in Canada (Site C) faced delays, requiring a revised timeline extending work through the spring of 2024.

  • A
    Quanta Services 10-Q filed 2022-11-04 Regulatory filing · published 4 Nov 2022 · retrieved 13 Oct 2026 · kept permanently by the SEC · fingerprint c5cab9199a91
    “Quanta and the customer agreed on a revised timeline and plan for the project, which requires an additional winter season of work through the spring of 2024” ✓ confirmed on the page

Market reaction: the shares moved -0.6% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (3 Nov 2022 to 8 Nov 2022). What this measures

Checked 13 Oct 2026.

Commitment DNA

The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.

Event type
Project other
Indicative materiality
Low rules
Action
Reach
Deliverable
Site C Transmission Line project
Where
British Columbia
Language
Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
In the company’s control
Medium
Specificity
High
Depends on
Customer

How this entry was checked

  1. Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
  2. First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
  3. Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
  4. Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.

Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works

Are you Quanta Services? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.

Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.

Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2018-PWR-008294 · Corrections policy

The Deadline Report

One email a week: the corporate commitments that came due, which were met, which slipped, and what is due next. Free. Stop any time.

No advertising. We never sell or share your address.