Separate Baker Hughes from GE
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-confirmed · human review in progress Independent AI checks agreed on primary SEC or regulator evidence. Records are now being reviewed by hand, starting with those our customers order.
- Announced
- 26 Jun 2018
- Due
- 30 Jun 2021
- Checked
- 29 Sep 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“GE plans to separate GE Healthcare into a standalone company, pursue an orderly separation from BHGE over the next two to three years”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The company did not complete the separation of its equity ownership in Baker Hughes by the 2021 deadline, as filings from 2022 continue to describe the exit as an ongoing plan.
-
A General Electric Co. 10-K filed 2022-02-11
“Over the past several years we have also been pursuing a variety of dispositions, including the ongoing monetization of our remaining equity ownership position in Baker Hughes” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A General Electric Co. 10-Q filed 2022-07-26
“our plan to pursue spin-offs of HealthCare and our combined Renewable Energy, Power and Digital businesses, and sales of our equity ownership positions in Baker Hughes and AerCap” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved +2.9% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (10 Feb 2022 to 15 Feb 2022). What this measures
Checked 29 Sep 2026.
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Transaction other
- Indicative materiality
- Medium rules
- Action
- Separate
- Deliverable
- Baker Hughes separation
- Language
- Expected (“expects”, “plans”)
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- Medium
- Depends on
- Regulatory, Shareholder
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: agreesA different AI model, Claude (Anthropic), re-read the evidence without being told the outcome and reached the same answer.
- Third check on a negative finding: agreesBecause a negative finding could harm a company if wrong, a stronger model re-read the evidence fully blind and reached the same answer.
Confirmed. This outcome counts towards the company's Kept Score. How verification works
Are you General Electric Co.? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2018-GE-001136 · Corrections policy