Deliver a high-volume, fully autonomous vehicle for ride sharing
Not delivered by the deadline
AI-assessed · human review in progress Found and assessed by AI from the cited sources. Shown with its evidence; it is not counted in any Kept Score until confirmed.
- Announced
- 10 Jan 2017
- Due
- 31 Dec 2021
- Checked
- 17 Oct 2026
- Deadline
- Met
- Late
- Not met
- Today
What the company said
“delivering a high-volume, fully autonomous vehicle for ride sharing in 2021.”
What we found
Evidence strength A What the grades mean
The provided SEC filings do not indicate that Ford delivered a high-volume, fully autonomous vehicle for ride-sharing by the end of 2021, instead describing autonomous vehicles as an area of ongoing development.
-
A Ford Motor Company 10-K filed 2022-02-04
“the Mobility segment primarily includes development costs for Ford’s autonomous vehicles and related businesses, Ford’s equity ownership in Argo AI (a developer of autonomous driving systems), and other mobility businesses and investments.” ✓ confirmed on the page
-
A Ford Motor Company 10-K filed 2022-02-04
“our ability to successfully grow through capacity expansion and investments in the areas of electrification, connectivity, digital and physical services, and mobility depends on many factors... that may significantly affect the future of electric and autonomous vehicles” ✓ confirmed on the page
Market reaction: the shares moved -11.9% against the S&P 500 over the three sessions around the disclosure (3 Feb 2022 to 8 Feb 2022). What this measures
Checked 17 Oct 2026.
Commitment DNA
The structured record of this commitment. Fields the company did not state are left blank rather than guessed.
- Event type
- Delivery
- Indicative materiality
- Medium rules
- Action
- Deliver
- Deliverable
- high-volume, fully autonomous vehicle for ride sharing
- In the company’s control
- High
- Specificity
- High
How this entry was checked
- Commitment recordedThe company's words were matched word for word against the filing.
- First checkAn AI model, Gemini (Google), read the company's later filings and recorded the outcome with a quoted passage.
- Second check: disagreesClaude (Anthropic) re-read the evidence blind and read it as “no_evidence”.
- Tie-breakA stronger model read the evidence and both earlier answers, without knowing which was recorded, and agrees with the second check.
Not yet confirmed. Shown on the record, but it will not count in any score until it is confirmed. How verification works
Are you Ford Motor Company? You can publish an official statement next to this entry, free. Add a statement.
Is something here wrong or out of date? Companies and readers can ask us to check it. Please bring a link to a public source.
Report an error in this entry Reference: KI-C-2017-F-012685 · Corrections policy